Revue Française de la recherche
en viandes et produits carnés

ISSN  2555-8560

 A la une ...


 
 

 

DERNIERS ARTICLES PARUS

Abstracts - Economie et Consommation

Questions about the consumption of meat products as part of a sustainable diet are becoming increasingly numerous. Injunctions to reduce the consumption of meat products, combined with concerns about consumer health, ecology and citizenship, are leading some consumers to opt for a more sustainable, and therefore more plant-based, diet. Nevertheless, the attachment to meat is reflected in a relatively slow erosion of consumption, due to a multiplicity of factors. The erosion of butchered meats now places poultry at the top of the list of species consumed.

Since 2011, IFIP has been calculating a competitiveness indicator for the pork sectors of the five main producers in the European Union: France, Germany, Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands, for INAPeORC and stakeholders in the French pork industry. This work is financed by INAPORC. The indicator analyzes over 85 variables divided into 8 themes: macroeconomics, animal feed, breeding, downstream companies, production dynamism, foreign trade, domestic consumption dynamism and industry organization. This second part presents the results obtained for the last four themes: production dynamism, foreign trade, domestic consumption dynamism and sector organization. This second part presents the results obtained for the last four themes: dynamic production, foreign trade, dynamic domestic consumption and organization of the industry. In 2022, pork production is down in each of the countries studied. However, trends vary from country to country, with some experiencing massive declines. In terms of foreign trade, international demand contracted slightly, but remained strong, posting all-time highs behind 2021 and 2020. France and Spain saw their consumption grow significantly, against a backdrop of a recovery in out-of-home consumption. Lastly, the report presents the structural characteristics of each of the pork sectors studied, as well as the year's key events that could modify these specific features. However, this theme is not considered when calculating the overall score presented in the conclusion.

Since 2011, Ifip has been calculating a competitiveness indicator for the pork sectors of the five main producers in the European Union (France, Germany, Denmark, Spain and the Netherlands), on behalf of INAPORC and stakeholders in the French pork industry. This work is funded by INAPORC. The indicator analyzes over 85 variables divided into 8 themes: macroeconomics, animal feed, breeding, downstream companies, production dynamism, foreign trade, domestic consumption dynamism and sector organization. This first part presents the results obtained for the first four themes: macroeconomics, animal feed, breeding, downstream companies. By 2022, competitiveness gaps between countries narrowed. Denmark has the highest overall competitiveness score, followed by Spain. France and the Netherlands, ranked 3rd and 4th respectively, saw their scores improve due to relatively more dynamic production, and France was further ahead of the Netherlands compared to the previous year. Germany’ score improved only slightly compared to 2021. The other side of the Rhine is still suffering the consequences of the presence of the African swine fever on its territory, and its pork production is declining.

Taking stock of the main meat sectors in Algeria (sheep, beef, goat and camel) helps us to understand Algerian consumers' perceptions and expectations regarding meat products. These sectors need to innovate in order to adapt to changes in consumer preferences. This book attempts to provide a practical summary for all stakeholders involved in these sectors.

Against a backdrop of steadily increasing numbers of game being taken and a resurgence in game damage, the hunting and venison industries, along with public authorities, have stepped up their efforts in recent years to improve the value and marketing of game meat. Unlike the situation in the UK and Germany, game meat in France, despite its abundance, is neither well promoted commercially nor popularized with consumers. The reasons for this include strict health regulations, a weak game collection and processing network, and a lack of public awareness of the benefits of this meat. In this article, we present the main findings and recommendations of the CGAAER report (Mission no. 21032, October 2021) on venison, and the main measures taken since then by the Fédération Nationale de la Chasse (FNC) to reverse this situation.

The Label Rouge (LR) beef sector is based on the compliance to precise specifications which are verified at the various stages of production by recordings and controls. In order to improve the added value of all the information gathered in the context of the operation of the LR beef sectors, new technical methods may be considered. One such method is the blockchain, a technology in strong development in several fields including agri-food traceability. The blockchain could be a solution to meet this new challenge. The development prospects of this technology have been identified through a technical feasibility study and a SWOT analysis. Finally, blockchain is suitable from a technical point of view to address the Label Rouge sector's concerns and the SWOT analysis enables the sector to visualize the implementation of this technology. To further evaluate the technical and financial feasibility of this solution, the development of a proof of concept of a blockchain on a Label Rouge sector would be necessary.

Page 1 of 3
Load More

Abonnez-vous !

Recevez notre Newsletter chaque trimestre. Vous êtes actuellement 4430 abonnés. VERIFIEZ DANS LES SPAMS ET ENREGISTRER L'EXPEDITEUR DANS VOTRE CARNET D'ADRESSES

Edito

A point nommé

La publication dans cette lettre d’information de "l’appel à action de Denver" et d’un article expliquant la genèse de cette mobilisation de chercheurs du monde entier (1) en faveur d’un débat public rationnel et étayé scientifiquement sur l’élevage et la viande tombe à point nommé. Une émission télévisée toute récente (2) illustre à quel point le traitement de ces questions semble vouloir régulièrement sortir de ce cadre pour y être porté sur un terrain émotionnel et moral, mais surtout idéologique. A son corps défendant, l’élevage et la viande se retrouvent ainsi attirés, comme dans un guet-apens, dans un affrontement fantasmé entre animal et végétal. L’essentiel du documentaire a ainsi été consacré à discréditer une partie des acteurs du débat, affublés des arrière-pensées les plus sombres. Au bout d’une heure trente, qu’est-ce que le téléspectateur aura retenu? Pratiquement rien, en dehors de ces supposés noirs desseins des filières, puisque l’émission réussit la performance de n’aborder aucun des sujets sur le fond. Le citoyen n’aura ainsi rien appris sur la consommation de viande en particulier de viande rouge (inférieure en moyenne en France aux recommandations nutritionnelles). Il ne saura rien des méthodes d’élevage en cours en France en comparaison de celles du reste du monde (il y aurait pourtant tant à dire). Il ne connaitra pas plus non plus les contributions et efforts du secteur élevage-viande en matière d’atténuation climatique. Alors oui, les signataires de l’appel de Denver ont raison de se mobiliser pour une politique guidée par le souci d'une alimentation équilibrée et de vouloir en finir "avec le discrédit généralisé de la viande, des produits laitiers et des œufs pour en revenir à des recommandations alimentaires pleinement fondées sur des preuves scientifiques, économiquement et culturellement appropriées". Ces chercheurs ont aussi raison d’attirer l’attention sur la prise en compte de la reconnaissance de la complexité des systèmes d'élevage et de l'écologie ou de rappeler que le rôle des scientifiques est de se confronter les uns aux autres "en appliquant des méthodes scientifiques rigoureuses, dans le respect mutuel et avec ouverture d’esprit". Non, la viande n’est ni de gauche ni de droite, ni masculine ni féminine, ni malfaisante ni miraculeuse. Elle participe à l’équilibre alimentaire de milliards d’hommes et mérite mieux que d’être ainsi l’otage de combats politiques complaisamment mis en scène.

Bruno CARLHIAN et Jean-François HOCQUETTE

(1) https://www.dublin-declaration.org/fr/
(2) https://www.france.tv/france-2/complement-d-enquete/7205066-la-guerre-de-l-info-touche-pas-a-mon-steak.html